As soon as I found they were available, which was 2 weeks ago, we ordered a limited amount and scheduled a photo session (as Wilson's pic in their online catalog is not good nor is it the accurate padding color).AVAILABLE ONLINE
The titanium umpire mask is now available to view online with some nice zoomed and alternative views.
One of the first things I did when I returned from vacation was to pull one of these from the warehouse to take a look. When I did, I expected to see a ray of light shine onto it from above and perhaps choral music and/or bugles proclaiming its arrival in the background. However, that didn't happen.
Instead, I was honestly a little disappointed. Yes, it's perhaps the best umpire mask on the market when you look at it feature by feature:
LIGHTWEIGHT
It's ultralight weight at 1 lb 3 ounces (1 and 1 without harness) makes it one of the lightest on the market.
SAFETY
It's wrap-around padding inherent on all Wilson umpire masks makes it perhaps one the safest mask on the market excluding a discussion of hockey style helmets.
PADDING
Its doeskin padding against the face will prove both comfortable and cool.
VISIBILITY
It's low-profile offers the best visibility available in a traditional umpire mask by offering around 15% better visibility through the main bars.
MIXED EMOTIONS
So why the disappointment? Perhaps it's mostly not what I had expected. Ever been disappointed by a good movie that you thought was going to be great?
For one, Wilson's '09 catalog shows the padding as all black. I had expected and hoped for the sleek look of the all black against the light gray titanium frame that I was used to seeing with the Nike titanium catcher's mask and that is trendy today. The color combination, though, I can live with that and others will likely prefer the tri-color combination anyway.
But what I have most difficulty living with is that Wilson went with a low profile frame rather than a more traditional curved frame. As a retailer, I had planned to push this mask with veteran umpires who see 80+ MPH fastballs on a regular basis, especially those in the college and MiLB ranks. It will be difficult to do that now as I know those customers prefer the more curved frame as physics dictates they'll allow for better glancing blows than a flatter mask. In the same line of thinking, it doesn't make sense for us to market a $200 mask to umpires who are just starting at a level where frame shape may not be as important.
Hmm. So as a retailer, I'm having trouble with the potential saleability of this umpire mask - especially in any significant numbers - given its price combined with its mix of features and very good available umpire mask alternatives.
BETTER CHOICES
Again, this is still a very good mask. But on the 4 features discussed above, there seem to be good alternatives at much better prices:
LIGHTWEIGHTThe Diamond Featherweight umpire mask is our best selling mask and at 1 pound (without the harness) is lighter than even the new Wilson Titanium. And if you just prefer the Wilson brand, the Chrome Moliben (New View) is indeed heavier but only by one-tenth of a pound. Both masks are under $80.
SAFETY
Because this new titanium mask has nothing like built-in shock absorbers featured on the new Wilson Shock FX umpire
helmet, it can't boast that it's any more safer than any other Wilson mask. On the issue of safety, the under $50 Wilson dyna-lite will do for traditional style protection. Now if protection is your main concern and have you had the $200 you were thinking on using for the new titanium mask, I would highly recommend buying the Shock FX titanium helmet instead... much better insurance for your head.PADDING
And if you want the two-tone padding or all doeskin, there are those as well for under $80.
VISIBILITYIf you've paid attention you now where this is going, and that is the chrome moliben offers the same visibility for again under $80.
TARGET MARKET
Based on the above, the only 2 target customers I see for this umpire mask are:
- Those who have to have the latest and greatest... and there are plenty of those out there (and by the way, we do love those customers); and
- those who just have to the multiple combination of features found in it that truly are not found elsewhere and at the same time have no problem dropping two Benjamins for it.
Wilson did not consult with me on the making of this mask, nor did I expect them to. When two current major league umpires have helped them design products in the past, and very good products at that, why would they venture beyond those guys? If they had, I would have strongly encouraged them to stick with the traditional frame shape and asked them to consider all-black leather at the hopes of a slightly lower price point.
Regardless, I do hope to gain further insights about the process of designing this mask during a meeting - that had been previously postponed - with our Wilson rep on Wednesday.
YOUR TURN
In the meantime, I would love your initial thoughts on this umpire mask including whether you agree or disagree with any of my thoughts above. I have been wrong before... and I hope I'm at least a little off here... and very well could be after umpires start providing feedback after its on-field use.
10 comments:
Jim,
I have heard from at least one MiLB umpire that MiLB is very concerned about about the low profile mask and the concussions that have occurred with umpires wearing them in professional baseball. I haven't seen anything in writing on this but have heard it more than once.
Lawrence
I think it also needs a small wing at the top. My mask now does not but I have seen a few that did. And for the money, I doubt if I buy one.
Be sure and tell Jean thank you. She does a wonderful job on orders.
Sincerely,
James Tucker
I had to have it, so I grabbed one as soon as it came out. I must say that I loved the light weight and the new view. (I also have the Shock FX, but use it only in tight quarters, because I prefer traditional masks and I like to wear a cap.)
I took a 85 m.p.h. uncaught cross-up shot right between the eyes, and the pads absorbed it beautifully. I did get a pretty good jolt, but the low-profile didn't seem to make that significant a difference, and for the increased visibility, I think it's worth it.
The Shock FX is out of this world. You can't even describe how much they improved on the lightness, comfort and visibility of these helmet masks. Even though the cage appears set out from the shell, your head also sits farther forward in the helmet, and the panorama is almost 180 degrees--better than any mask. It's even cooler than the others.
There's a reason why it's $200. It's worth every cent. I'm going to eventually switch over full time from the old school mask because of this thing.
Pros: Everyone wants to look at it. It is just a tad bit lighter than my Dyna-Lite with old school WV square pads. I appear to be calling more strikes with the New View style and thinner bars. I don't have to look at the white residue from baseballs hitting me in the grill, nor do I have to worry about the plastic chips hitting me in the eyes after season 2.
Cons: The padding reminds me of 1978. I've had to stop wearing my wedding band and using the Markwort aluminum indicator, because the sound is like fingernails on a chalk board.
One of my partners just showed off his new Wilson Titanium mask...wow...a lot lighter than mine. About the third 9-inning game behind the plate on a 80+ degree day and I was wishing I had one of them. I didn't realize how heavy my mask was. Still, I'm seeing a lot more of the higher caliber baseball and am also concerned about 80+ mph pitches hitting me straight ahead. I'm more inclined to go with the Shock FX since recently I tried that one and it actually fit over a hat which I don't feel right without. Price isn't the problem for me..just deciding which helmet to spend my next two Benjamins on. Hmmm!
Something that was brought up at our rules meeting in April, was the possiblity of umpires having to wear the hockey style mask. Guess we'll have to wait and find out.
The mask is available in a traditional view!!! It looks exactly like the New-View except without the low profile. I am sure Jim can order you one.
I have issues with the fact that the standard curve titanium mask that is supposed to be like the Wilson Dyna Lite mask is not excatly true the extended throat gaurd is not the same as the original. The throat guard on the mask is like the nu view throat guard. The weight is great on days when it is hot, I work games in the desert at times when it is 110 outside, and it is great not to have all that weight hanging on your head.
That is an excellent point about the difference in the throat guard as it's not previously been discussed. The new titanium masks throat guards don't extend down as much as other Wilson masks do.
My measurements are a difference of 5/8ths of an inch. I'm not sure how significant this difference is for the minority that choose not to add a throat guard extension. But for the majority who wear an added 4" or 6" extension, the difference becomes much less significant.
And we did add the titanium mask in a standard profile frame as well.
Thanks for all of your comments. Please keep them coming.
Hi Jim,
It's been over a year since comments were posted on the low profile masks (at least on this particular entry). Have any opinions changed about the safety of LP masks? I am looking to buy a new mask. I do mostly LL (Major - Senior) but started doing some American Legion ball last year and we are rumored to be getting Big League in our district. I like the idea of LP for the better "view" but don;t want to sacrifice safety. Any new thoughts on this topic?
Ron
Post a Comment